"Never 
          Blame the Booster 
          For What the Sucker Does"
        
      by 
        Sally Detroit 
      Hello 
        out there in Smoke Signals land. 
         
        Lookit. I got a new secretary these days. Lucky for me he can type because 
        he can't do anything else and I have a story I want to tell you that he 
        knows better than me. 
         
        The other night when I come back to my office what do I see but my secretary's 
        generosity gone overboard with good hootch towards this bum I do not know. 
        My secretary says, "Hey Sally, this is Wormer Von Hackensack" or such, 
        "the famous physicist," and I go like "Ya Ya," noticing that this Wormer 
        is putting away 12-year-old J&B like it is Pabst Blue Ribbon. He is 
        sitting there behind my desk, reading your rag, the one with the fella 
        saying "SHOW YOUR BLUE LIGHT" out the middle of his teeth (Ed. note: SS 
        no. 1,2) and was reading out loud from that piece VISIONS OF A FUNKY GOD. 
        He lays down the magazine, and without even Greetings or Salutations says 
        that the writer knows nothing about particle physics and has to tally 
        misconstrued the uncertainty principle, like most laymen, but somehow 
        has shelled a small grain of truth. He then made a point of elaborately 
        clarifying the uncertainty principle, emphasizing that its basis and function 
        is in the observer's perceptions and the empiric conditions surrounding 
        the experiment, not the subject of the experiment itself. That our attention 
        effects changes in the behavior of the subject under scrutiny is indisputable, 
        but it is necessary to ground that perception in the awareness of the 
        fact that we may or may not have glimpsed the absolute nature of the subject. 
        Such is the stuff of Schrodinger's equations. We observe the hydrogen 
        atom under as many conditions that we can devise, attempting to discover 
        its nature, and we discover we have learned more about our own resources 
        and the infinite capacity of matter than any solid certainty. Our attention 
        is in direct relationship to the results of our experiment. That's Heisenberg. 
        That God was brought into the equation by your writer was great inspiration 
        to Wormer, and he told us this story. 
         
        Seems some forty-odd years ago, the original quantum boys took a break 
        from various stunning revelations to do some climbing in the Bavarian 
        Alps. The party consisted of Wormer, Niels Bohr, Heisenberg, and two new 
        young hot ones, now forgotten. Bohr had just discovered traces of what 
        could be anti-matter, under conditions that had been predicted by Einstein 
        many years before, and this caused a great deal of excitement within the 
        crowd. The excitement was more about the fact that this maybe anti-matter 
        had been fingered by Einstein than that Bohr had come across it, because 
        Einie had cut them loose and eschewed their realm and methods of consideration 
        on all levels before he split for the U.S. of A., and here he was again. 
        "It seems," said Wormer, "that Einie was always like Banquo's ghost at 
        Bohr's feast of the imagination. All the time, no matter what they, the 
        quantum boys, were doing, Niels was arguing with Einie. 
         
        So anyway, the story goes that they are all knee-deep halfway up some 
        snowy Beethoven peak making for the chalet at the ridge, with Wormer deep 
        in thought about how they all are making like wise formidable tracks in 
        the absolute consecration of the scientific method when, lo and behold, 
        all are swept away in an avalanche. It turned out to be the small size 
        of Alpine avalanche, but it was enough to keep everyone deeply and suddenly 
        silent for some stunning moments there. Everyone dug or was dug out relatively 
        intact and relatively quickly, and they made it to the chalet in relatively 
        no time at all. It turned out that they had to hole up for a couple of 
        days and so, to pass the time, they played poker. 
         
        Some three days go by and Wormer is losing steadily to Bohr and Heisenberg. 
        He has to throw his hand in again and again because he just can't play 
        against such madmen who bluff crazily, nonsensically, and irrationally 
        while they make jokes about anti-matter and Schrodinger potentialities 
        when they are looking at three of a kind and more. 
         
        On the evening of the fourth night it is just the three of them left. 
        Wormer is playing on markers and Bohr has taken to talking aloud with 
        Einstein. Heisenberg deals a hand of seven card stud and Wormer comes 
        ups with a straight flush, natural, King-high in clubs on the first five 
        cards; 10, J, K showing. Bohr has a possible straight flush himself, the 
        J, Q, K of diamonds, and Heisenberg deals himself three sevens as neat 
        as could be. Wormer is wondering where he can come up with the scratch 
        to write his markers as the betting goes around again, and he gets his 
        ace, Niels gets his ten and Heisenberg comes up with the fourth seven. 
        Bohr is mumbling at Einie and kicking the pot. 
         
        "So," he says, "Schrodinger made it distasteful, yes, he did. Too many 
        uncertainties, yes. Bump that five. Yes. Too much chaos, hey? God does 
        not play dice with the universe, right? But, again, that is our anthropomorphic 
        disposition. Is it not possible--bump that ten--that the element of randomness 
        is so powerful and pervasive that It is in fact identical with any notion 
        of God we might have? A black God for sure, but a God nonetheless. We 
        play god, each of us, when we manipulate the nuclei of atoms, do we not, 
        and we ourselves introduce elements of chance that had not existed before 
        our intrusion into the subatomic structure, yes. Ten more. Our ability 
        to construe reality is as much a fundament of the process as are the atoms 
        we dissect and the tools we use. I know you do not like that idea, but 
        it is unquestionably a fact of our existence that belief shapes reality. 
        Yes. Yes, you're right: that is my own belief, actually, but hasn't it 
        been proven again and again? It is a verifiable hypothesis. 
         
        "You are not convinced. Heisenberg is convinced. He folds his hand. Heisenberg 
        is convinced I have a straight flush. Ah, Wormer is not convinced. Or 
        rather, Wormer, is convinced that he has a straight flush himself. But 
        Wormer is on borrowed time and at a disadvantage in his suit. I am going 
        to call you, Wormer. But not until I have bumped you again. There." 
         
        Wormer knew he was caught. He had to bet, but he was convinced that Bohr 
        had him beat. They never split the pot--it was all or nothing--and Wormer 
        had never imagined that he would see the day when an ace-high straight 
        would look like nothing. 
         
        "God does not play dice," Bohr continued, "but in considering the vastness, 
        and suddenness of potentialities that exist in our own minds, we must 
        allow for as vast and sudden occurrences in the natural world outside 
        our minds. If we had a unified field theory, I might be as disgusted by 
        the notion of a dice-playing Creator as you are, but we do not have a 
        unified field, not even in our own minds. Yes, you are right. We may as 
        well consider this poker game a unified field according to the notion 
        of consensual realities I have suggested. Yes. In fact, we should. 
         
        "In fact, this is a perfect laboratory!" 
         
        "Of the five fields, we know the least about gravity. The first four are 
        sufficiently represented by the cards, our hands, the game, and the pot. 
        Betting is gravity. Do you agree? Good. So maybe God plays poker. What 
        do you think? I'll ask: Wormer, does your God play poker?" 
         
        Heisenberg leaned back in his chair and strummed his folded hand. "Y-e-s-s-s," 
        he said, eventually. "Dice is too deterministic for my God. Human will 
        can't exist unless the possibility of chance, open space, also exists. 
        My God wants to give human beings a chance." 
         
        "And you, Wormer, does your God play dice? Or is poker His game?" 
         
        Wormer raised Bohr. Bohr bumped back. Wormer said, "My God acts according 
        to the time. Impeccably. That is why He is my God. In church He prays 
        and is worshipped. At home He cooks the food, eats, and is eaten. In the 
        streets he argues, buys, trades, sells, weeps. Yes. He plays dice, and 
        the players, and their hopes and their fears, and their loss and deliverance. 
        My God is very busy, and He is never alone. God is never alone, and He 
        enjoys poker." 
         
        "Wormer's God plays poker," Bohr asked Wormer. 
         
        "Yes. God sometimes loses. Nietzsche beat him." 
         
        Hearty chuckles and grunts were emitted all around. 
         
        "To you," Wormer reminded Bohr. 
         
        "Of course," he said. He peeked at the corner of his hole cards, smiling, 
        jibing Einstein. "Of course. Talk about gravity! what ..." 
         
        Wormer looked up to see Bohr's jaw drop. 
         
        Bohr looked at Wormer and folded his hand. 
         
        Wormer said it took him a long moment for him to collect his thoughts 
        enough to bring in the pot. 
         
        He suddenly realized that he was in sausages for the rest of his life. 
         
        "Did you have it?" Heisenberg asked quietly. 
         
        Wormer, caught in a newfound spirit of largesse, flipped over his hole 
        cards before he finished clearing the table. 
         
        He sorted the bills from his markers a while before he noticed that an 
        unnaturally thick silence was all around him. 
         
        He looked up as Heisenberg broke into his unmistakable laugh. It was always 
        the best laugh the Wormer ever heard. Heartfelt and infectious it was, 
        and Wormer had to smile to himself though he knew not why. 
         
         
        Heisenberg always enjoyed his laugh like no one 
        Wormer ever knew before or since. He was howling. Tears came to his eyes. 
        He held his stomach and gasped. He fell off his chair. He rolled over 
        and staggered to his feet. He grabbed his chair and fell down again. 
         
        Bohr came in loud and clear at that point. He hooted. He yowled and pointed 
        at Heisenberg. His face collapsed into an accordion of panic and then 
        blew up from a choking yuk to a full-throated-leave-me-alone-again-Mother-I'm 
        losing-it-loving-it-can't-stand-it-here-again near-hysteria before Wormer 
        could sit up straight and reach across the table to turn over Bohr's hand. 
         
        There he saw the ace of hearts capping that sweet diamond straight. He 
        half-smiled at the two of them and shrugged apologetically as the two 
        younger members of their company came sleepy-eyed into the circle of the 
        overhead lantern. 
         
        He looked down again at the cards splayed across the table and noticed 
        that there was a queen of spades in his own royal club straight. 
         
        He smeared all the hands wide open. That was the way it lay. No one had 
        slipped any cards, the deck was intact. 
         
        "God bluffs," I said. 
         
        "That's exactly what Heisenberg said!" Wormer looked amazed. "It was the 
        turning point in my life." 
         
        "Heisenberg would have won," I said. 
         
        "Ya. He got his laughs." 
         
        "What did Bohr say?" 
         
        "He said that God bluffs." 
         
        "Everyone agreed then?" 
         
        "Everyone agreed, yes. Everyone agreed. And everyone won the Nobel Prize 
        and died in dignity. Yes." 
         
        "You made great contributions, Wormer," pipes in my secretary. 
         
        "Yes, I did. Among the greatest. I know. I held to my God. Chances change, 
        anyone loses. Anyone could have won. Heisenberg had the cards; Niels could 
        have played me out; and so we joke and say God bluffs. As if we know the 
        difference. As if we know the difference. You need the wisdom of innocence, 
        all the luck of beginners, you hope you wind up in a hand you know you 
        are playing, but still, but still, you got to remember God bluffs." 
      |